Editorial standard

Opportunity Library methodology

The library teaches research structure with fictional, non-brand-specific concepts. It is not a public view into Falcon AI.

Separate observation from interpretation

A record begins with a narrow research question. It names the product attributes that would make listings comparable, describes what a signal could mean, and preserves anything not supplied as unknown. Missing data never becomes proof of low competition, demand, quality, or profit.

Use only safe illustrative fields

Records discuss category, comparability, demand interpretation, competition interpretation, fulfillment uncertainty, seller dependency, return risk, timing, confidence, missing evidence, and an editorial conclusion. They contain no identifiers, sellers, marketplace copy, current prices, current reviews, account data, or private recommendations.

Use neutral evidence labels

Stronger evidence, Mixed evidence, Limited evidence, and More research required describe the editorial evidence condition. They do not rank products or instruct a reader to transact.

Keep private systems isolated

The static library has no API or database connection. Its local search filters published HTML in the browser and sends no query elsewhere. Private providers, dashboards, research sessions, calculations, thresholds, and decision logic are not published.

Apply the disclaimer consistently

Every demonstration is an example only, not current marketplace data, not a recommendation to buy or sell, not a profit guarantee, and not generated from a user account. Evidence may be intentionally unknown.

For the broader editorial process, read Falcon Opportunity methodology and the conceptual evidence framework.